Would have been interesting to find a 1st half vs. 2nd half box score, but looking at the final box (also, no HD Box score available, since play-by-play for the game isn't available):
VISITORS: Villanova
..... TOT-FG 3-PT REBOUNDS
## Player FG FGA FG FGA FT FTA OF DE TOT PF TP A TO BLK S MIN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01 REYNOLDS, Scottie... * 4 14 1 7 2 4 0 4 4 1 11 4 1 0 1 40
15 REDDING, Reggie..... * 4 6 2 4 1 1 1 4 5 2 11 0 2 0 0 31
33 CUNNINGHAM, Dante... * 3 11 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 5 7 0 0 1 2 22
34 SUMPTER, Curtis..... * 6 16 2 8 4 8 1 5 6 3 18 1 3 2 0 39
50 SHERIDAN, Will...... * 2 2 0 0 6 6 3 6 9 3 10 1 1 2 2 37
12 NARDI, Mike......... 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 8
20 CLARK, Shane........ 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
TM TEAM................ 2 2 4 1 1
Totals................. 19 51 5 19 14 20 8 24 32 16 57 8 8 5 5 200
HOME TEAM: Georgetown
..... TOT-FG 3-PT REBOUNDS
## Player FG FGA FG FGA FT FTA OF DE TOT PF TP A TO BLK S MIN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
02 WALLACE, Jonathan... * 3 6 3 5 1 2 0 4 4 1 10 5 2 0 0 35
03 SUMMERS, DaJuan..... * 3 8 3 7 1 3 1 3 4 2 10 0 0 1 1 29
21 SAPP, Jessie........ * 3 10 0 5 2 4 2 2 4 1 8 6 1 0 1 34
32 GREEN, Jeff......... * 5 14 0 4 2 2 3 6 9 4 12 1 3 1 0 31
55 HIBBERT, Roy........ * 6 9 0 0 2 2 1 1 2 3 14 2 0 2 1 28
01 MACKLIN, Vernon..... 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 6
05 RIVERS, Jeremiah.... 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 3 2 0 1 0 0 11
22 CRAWFORD, Tyler..... 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 5
33 EWING, Patrick...... 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 4 4 1 1 3 1 2 2 21
TM TEAM................ 3 3 6
Totals................. 23 54 7 24 9 15 11 27 38 18 62 18 9 6 5 200
Obviously, the 18-8 assists advantage (on 4 more FGs) is nice. I calculate a pace of 60, so Georgetown's Off. Eff. = 103.3, Nova's Off. Eff. = 95.0, similar to the last G'town v. Nova game (105.2 v. 99.8).
Georgetown had an eFG% of 49.1%, still below their season average. The team's offensive TO% was 15% (best performance since the Louisville game), OR% = 31.4% (well below the season average of 40.8) and FTM/FGA = 16.7% (also low).
On defense, G'town allowed eFG% = 42.2%, TO% = 13.3%, OR% = 22.9% (Nova had gone 46.9% & 36.6% the first two games), and the dreaded FT defense (FTA/FGM) = 39.2%.
Looking ahead at the Notre Dame game, I hope Mike has a nice preview, because I'm not planning on running through their season numbers.
The Hoyas won the first meeting between these teams, 66-48, in a game that wasn't that close. Don't expect a blowout tomorrow, as Georgetown shot eFG% = 68.2 (2nd best on the season), while NDU was at 34.6% (worst on the season) in that game. I'd be surprised if either team repeated that performance.
Here's an updated log5 table, through tonight's games (all the top seeds won):
| Seed | Team | Qtrs | Semis | Finals | Champ |
| 1 | Georgetown | 100% | 100 | 67.9 | 43.0 |
| 2 | Louisville | 100 | 100 | 44.3 | 17.5 |
| 3 | Pittsburgh | 100 | 100 | 55.7 | 25.0 |
| 4 | Notre Dame | 100 | 100 | 32.1 | 14.4 |
| 5 | Syracuse | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Marquette | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | West Virginia | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | DePaul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | Villanova | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | Providence | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | St. John's | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | Connecticut | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oh, and Nike's marketing department wants me to tell you that Georgetown was wearing their new sneakers tonight:
Only $150 (buy 2! buy 3!), coming to a Nike website store near you soon. You can post your comments about these kicks here. My wife is hoping they'll now send some nice free size 8 women's shoes our way; I'll keep my $30 running shoes (on closeout at Kohl's).
No comments:
Post a Comment