Showing posts with label Hollis Thompson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollis Thompson. Show all posts

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Season review: Lineup stats

Hola amigos,

It's been a while since I've rapped with you all, but things have been pretty hairy here at Chez HP, what with another depressing end of the season for the Hoyas and real life and all.

But, I've dusted off the Cray II in my mom's basement and fired it up for the first time in a couple of months to take a look at last season, because those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

For today's episode, we'll take a look at lineup stats from last season.  I'm going to break the stats out two ways:  for all games played against Top 100 teams, and looking at the last ten games played (all games in Feb and March, as the Hoyas went 4-6).

Here we go:

vs. Top 100 Opponents (min. 15 poss both off and def)

.                                             Offense                 Defense
Lineup                                 # poss  OEff   Time     # poss  DEff   Time
Clark-Freeman-Thompson-Vaughn-Wright    288    126    17.4       277   103    19.5
Clark-Freeman-Lubick-Vaughn-Wright      221    103    17.1       221   103    18.6
Clark-Freeman-Lubick-Sims-Wright         88    101    18.2        90   121    19.3
Clark-Freeman-Sims-Thompson-Wright       88    123    17.0        86   107    17.3
Benimon-Clark-Freeman-Vaughn-Wright      63    114    17.7        64   123    19.7
Clark-Freeman-Lubick-Thompson-Vaughn     57     83    18.9        58   109    20.1
Freeman-Lubick-Thompson-Vaughn-Wright    47    132    18.5        44   100    20.5
Benimon-Clark-Freeman-Sims-Wright        38    111    16.4        42    88    18.3
Freeman-Lubick-Sims-Thompson-Wright      30     83    19.9        34    74    17.6
Clark-Lubick-Thompson-Vaughn-Wright      28    125    17.4        30    80    17.1
Clark-Freeman-Lubick-Starks-Thompson     22    100    16.6        17   100    16.1
Benimon-Clark-Freeman-Sims-Thompson      19    126    22.3        18   117    15.9
Freeman-Lubick-Starks-Thompson-Vaughn    18     61    23.5        16   138    15.7
Clark-Freeman-Lubick-Sims-Starks         16    100    20.4        18    56    22.3
Benimon-Freeman-Sims-Thompson-Wright     18    106    16.6        16    38    18.8
Benimon-Clark-Thompson-Vaughn-Wright     17     71    19.8        17   106    20.6
Freeman-Lubick-Sanford-Sims-Wright       18    100    20.3        16   163    18.1

For the season as a whole, Coach Thompson had two preferred lineups, with his four upperclassmen (Clark, Freeman, Vaughn and Wright) and either Hollis Thompson or Nate Lubick playing the "4".  These represent the main two starting lineups used, where Lubick replaced Thompson as a starter for the second St. John's game forward.

The immediate takeaway from the top two lines is that JT3's move to insert Lubick into a more prominent role by making him a starter didn't work.  I'm unaware of a direct quote as to why Coach Thompson swapped the two midway through conference play, although it was likely to improve a struggling defense.  However, the stats reveal that the team was equally efficient defensively with either player on the floor, but gave up a huge amount on the offensive end without Hollis on the floor.  In fact, effective offensive lineups for the Hoyas last season [120+ OEff] had only one constant:  Hollis Thompson.

More interestingly, of those lineups with at least 20 possessions played on both ends of the court, the two most effective last season had Lubick and Thompson on the court together [Freeman-Lubick-Thompson-Vaughn-Wright: +32 net efficiency; Clark-Lubick-Thompson-Vaughn-Wright: +45].  It's expected that Hollis will move to the "3" spot next season, so this bodes well.  Of course, neither Chris Wright nor Julian Vaughn will be around to help.


A look at the last ten games of the season after the jump

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

The Back-up Quarterbacks

The argument for the bench players.

Henry Sims versus Julian Vaughn

Copyright AP 2010
Is Henry Sims even the backup quarterback anymore? Yes, Vaughn is averaging more minutes right now, but Henry played more versus Appalachian State, Utah State, Missouri, and NC State. That's four of the last six games, excepting only Temple and Asheville.

Vaughn does do several things better than Henry. He obviously has a better low post game from a footwork and moves standpoint.

He's a superior rebounder right now, which actually shocked me a bit. I'd definitely say he's a better offensive rebounder (even after accounting for all those he gets off his own misses), and defensively, he's held his own as well, upping his game recently.

I think most people would be surprised to know that he also doesn't turn over the ball as much as Henry does on a percentage basis. Neither one is exactly Roy Hibbert there -- they are both a liability. But Julian has been less of one.

Still, Henry's been just as effective offensively. Mostly because he's a superior passer and a better shooter. Julian is shorter and isn't a great jumper, so he gets blocked/misses a lot of close in shots. Henry doesn't have as much a problem with those.

Perhaps the biggest advantage for Henry over Julian offensively has nothing to with Henry or Julian's efficiency, but rather the focus. For some reason, when Julian is on the floor, the ball is fed to him (26% poss, 22% shooting). In fact, when Julian is on the floor, he's the #1 option.

Julian's a good player. But he's often the worst offensive option on the floor. That's not a knock; it's speaking to the abilities of our perimeter players. He shouldn't be using more possessions than everyone else.

Henry, in contrast, isn't taking up possessions nearly as much (16% poss, 14% shooting). Which doesn't make him a better offensively player -- he's likely worse -- but it might makes the team better on offense when he's on the floor, depending on who is out there with him. In fact, one could argue Julian is better suited to play with the bench players as there's a greater need for an offensive player.

Defensively, Julian blocks significantly more shots, but it's my impression that he's not as much of a presence down low. No one publishes stats on altered shots (or really could), but subjectively, our interior defense seems to look worse with him on the floor.

As evidence of this, I give you the lineup work Brian did here.

There have been a ton of lineups, which means small samples abound, but here's some comparable lineups and their D efficiencies:
Lineup                      w Vaughn   w Sims
CW - AF - JC - HT              94         91
CW - AF - JC - JB             111         87
CW - AF - JC - NL              89         75 

Those are the six lineup with 28 defensive possessions played or more. The next highest lineup was only on the floor for 18 possessions, and that seems a little too low to mean anything.

Vaughn comes out as a superior defender in the net points calculation, which isn't surprising. He blocks more shots and that calculation takes overall team D during the player's time on the floor and allocates based on statistics like those.

However, when looking at comparable lineups (above), the lineups with Sims are significantly better. Sometimes, this can be due to easier competition, but Sims' time on the floor has often been in tougher games (NC State, Mizzou, Utah State), really only missing on Temple and ODU (who are stronger defensively). In other words, it doesn't seem all that likely that the differences are competition-driven instead of actually being better defense.

If I had to pick, I'd take Sims defensively.

Overall, I'd really consider swapping Vaughn and Sims in general. I think there's value in giving more time to Vaughn with the backups - Lubick, Starks, etc. -- who are not offensive creators. Vaughn simply fits with them better with his superior low post moves. Most likely, III is going to continue to do what he's been doing -- playing match-ups -- with Sims' minutes moving steadily upward.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Home vs. road splits so far

Georgetown takes on Providence tomorrow in a game that I don't think many Hoya fans are expecting to be a close game.  Right now, Pomeroy shows Georgetown to be only a 6 point favorite on the road (the Hoyas were about a 10 point favorite against South Florida last Wednesday).  A win tomorrow will go a long way towards solidifying Georgetown's top-4 status in the Big East.

Tangentially, there was an interesting comment that I noticed on HoyaTalk today about Hollis Thompson, that I suspect was tossed out a bit off the cuff (h/t MCIGuy):
I agree he hasn't exactly arrived. He can shoot. And he is a very good passer, a willing rebounder and a pretty impressive defender. But when he starts driving to the hoop and taking advantage of his speed and athleticism then we can say he has arrived.

Oh, and playing good on the road for once would be a heck of a start.

My first thought was, "Where the heck does he get that idea?"  Then I realized that he probably got that idea right here - I do post home/road splits for all players. So I went to take a look:
H.Thompson - Home / Road Splits

Venue             G    % Min   % Poss   % Shot    ORat    TS%
Home             13     48.7    12.4     11.9    128.0   1.38       
Road/Neutral      9     49.7    12.1     12.6     72.0   0.61

Wow, that's quite a difference in offensive efficiency.

So now I felt that I had to dig in a bit more in home / road splits for the Hoyas, both as a team and for individual players.  To refine things a bit, I'm going to filter out all games against teams ranked worse than 100 by KenPom.com; this removes seven games from the dataset:  @ Tulane, @ Savannah St., vs. Lafayette, vs. Mt. St. Mary's, vs. American, @ DePaul, vs. Rutgers.

Here are the team splits:
.               Georgetown           Opponent
              Home    Road/N      Home    Road/N
Record         7-2      3-3
Pace          69.2     69.1

Eff.         107.2     99.4       98.9     99.9
Eff. Margin    8.3     -0.5

eFG %         57.0     50.0       47.3     47.8
TO %          23.0     22.4       19.9     19.6
OR %          29.4     29.4       35.1     30.7
FTA/FGA       46.5     40.3       31.8     33.6

2FG %         57.6     47.3       48.3     46.7
3FG %         37.1     37.5       30.1     33.3
FT %          71.1     73.4       69.0     75.7

I've highlighted the important differences between home and road games.  A few of these surprised me.
  • Game pace is essentially the same for the home vs. away games, so a comparison of stats not adjusted for pace would be fine.
  • The substantial difference between home and road games is from the offense (+7.8 Off. Eff.) rather than the defense (-1.0 Def. Eff).
  • The only significant difference in the underlying four factors for offense is shooting accuracy (+7.0 eFG%); TO rate is very similar (and actually better away from Verizon), OR % is exactly the same and the difference in FT rate is probably buoyed a bit by the winning record at home (teams behind tend to foul more).
    • The driver for the difference in shooting is 2FG%, not 3FG% which is what I expected.  Very strange.
  • The only significant difference for the four factors on defense is rebounding - the Hoyas are giving up a few extra chances at home than on the road.  But it looks like the small differences in the other factors effectively cancel this out.  Also, opponents seem to shoot FTs worse at Verizon than on their own courts.


Next, let's take a look at some player split stats:

Home games

Player Name         G  % Min % Poss % Shot  ORat  TS%   TO%    2FG    %     3FG    %
Freeman, Austin     9   92.5  21.9   25.7  117.6  1.39  20.6  47/71 0.662  17/37 0.459
Wright, Chris       9   89.2  21.8   25.4  116.1  1.20  14.9  43/69 0.623  10/34 0.294
Monroe, Greg        9   89.2  25.5   24.0  103.5  1.10  19.7  47/87 0.540   2/10 0.200
Clark, Jason        9   78.9  14.3   16.2  110.0  1.37  25.6  10/17 0.588  19/41 0.463
Vaughn, Julian      9   62.5  19.8   17.6   99.6  1.11  24.6  28/48 0.583   0/ 2 0.000
Thompson, Hollis    9   45.8  13.3   11.1  107.2  1.11  23.8   5/12 0.417   4/11 0.364
Benimon, Jerrelle   8   27.5  11.5    4.8   73.1  1.02  45.8   1/ 4 0.250   0/ 2 0.000


Road/neutral games

Player Name         G  % Min % Poss % Shot  ORat  TS%   TO%    2FG    %     3FG    %
Freeman, Austin     6   85.8  23.3   26.0  117.3  1.30  18.1  19/43 0.442  16/28 0.571
Wright, Chris       6   85.8  20.6   19.4  100.2  1.06  21.8  18/34 0.529   4/19 0.211
Monroe, Greg        6   88.3  26.0   26.3   95.8  1.05  18.9  35/70 0.500   1/ 4 0.250
Clark, Jason        6   90.8  15.5   18.0  106.9  1.13  17.2   8/23 0.348  13/29 0.448
Vaughn, Julian      6   58.8  20.9   20.9   95.2  1.09  25.6  20/36 0.556   0/ 3 0.000
Thompson, Hollis    6   51.7  12.4   12.2   59.8  0.53  26.5   3/10 0.300   1/10 0.100
Benimon, Jerrelle   6   25.0  11.7    8.8   72.8  1.07  41.4   2/ 5 0.400   1/ 2 0.500


Now there's a lot more numbers here to process, but here are some of the salient points I take away:
  • The drop-off from home to road games is much worse for Thompson than any other Hoya:
.             Change
Player         ORat
Freeman       - 0.3
Wright        -15.9
Monroe        - 7.8
Clark         - 3.1
Vaughn        - 1.3
Thompson      -47.4
Benimon       - 0.3
    Why is he struggling so much more? Well, he just doesn't take a lot of shots compared to his teammates, and he's not had much luck with outside shooting on the road. He also doesn't get the FT line on the road (not shown) [11/14 FT at home, 2/3 FT on the road].  So, while his stats don't look very good, one hot shooting night on the road would help a lot to get him back in line with his teammates.
  • The big drop if 2FG% accuracy from home to road games isn't being driven by the bigs (Monroe/Vaughn) missing their layups.  Instead, it's coming from the guards, especially Freeman and Clark.
  • On the other hand, Clark and especially Freeman don't seem to suffer shooting from deep on the road.  If you haven't realized this yet, Chris Wright is just not a good outside shooter against quality teams.
  • Wright is doing a great job controlling the ball at home; his road turnover rate is actually acceptable for a primary ball-handler.  Jerrelle Benimon turns the ball over a whole bunch.  Henry Sims (not shown) is actually worse.


Well, that's all for tonight. Let's see if Georgetown's road offense can get a bump playing against Providence, one of the most generous defenses in the conference.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Season Preview: Hollis Thompson

Hollis Thompson isn’t likely to be the best player on the Hoyas. He isn’t likely to be the most important player, either, if you are one of those folks who separate “best” from “most valuable.” However, to an outsider at least, Hollis Thompson is likely the Hoya with the widest range of reasonable expectations for performance this year.

The green-shirt freshman was originally slated to graduate from high school at the end of the 2008-09 school year. A lanky, 6’8” small forward out of Southern California, Thompson was ranked 27th in the RSCI [Recruiting Service Consensus Index] heading into his senior season of high school and was particularly known for his ability to shoot and score.

Due to personal circumstances, Hollis decided to graduate from high school in December and enroll early at Georgetown. Despite the fact that this could only help Thompson – getting college coaching early – his recruiting ranking slipped and he ended up at 76 in the RSCI, due mainly to some recruiting experts dropping him off their Top 100 lists completely, presumably because they no longer considered him a recruit.

Two major contributors from last year, DaJuan Summers and Jessie Sapp, are gone from this year’s team. The Hoyas also played a three guard lineup last year primarily because the team’s power forwards were ineffective. This lineup was not always effective, especially on defense. Summers was the team’s only above average "true" small forward, and he is in the NBA.

There’s room in the rotation for Hollis Thompson.


What are the chances that Thompson is a significant contributor this year? What can the Hoyas expect in terms of production?

We can get an idea of the answer to both those questions by looking at freshmen under John Thompson III at Georgetown.

Playing Time
.                                 # (%) played   # (%) played
Player Group total >10 mpg >20 mpg

All recruited frosh 17 9 (53%) 6 (35%)
RSCI-ranked freshmen 6 4 (67%) 3 (50%)
*The data set excludes Chris Wright, who was injured much of his freshman year, and Nikita Mescheriakov, who red-shirted.


Coach Thompson has had 17 freshmen who were able to play for the majority of their freshman year, and about half of them contributed at a backup level at the minimum. About a third played over 20 mpg, about starter level or strong sixth man.

The fact that Hollis Thomspon is a highly recruited player makes his chances of being a contributor even stronger – 2/3 of RSCI freshmen contribute and half have seized major rotation minutes during their freshman year.

Of course, we know more about Hollis than the average freshman. Between Kenner League performances and JTIII’s commentary, it seems safe to say that his chances of breaking 10 mpg barrier are stronger than 67%.

With this year's short roster, we can also take a fairly educated guess about the Hoyas’ likely rotation this year. Don’t pay too much attention to any one player’s estimate. The takeaway is that, once you exclude Thompson from playing power forward or center and account for a healthy increase in playing time for Jason Clark, there’s about 30 minutes available at either guard or small forward.
Player         Est mpg     Min. Left
. 200
Monroe 32 168
Wright 31 137
Freeman 30 107
Clark 27 80
Sims 23 57
Vaughn 23 34
Mescheriakov/
Benimon as PF 4 30

Mesch. as SF ?
Sanford ?
Thompson ?

So there’s potential for Hollis to take a very significant role. The RSCI-ranked Hoya freshmen play 20 mpg or more about 50% of the time, and that seem about right for Thompson. There are thirty minutes available, but Sanford has been drawing strong review and Mescheriakov played 17 mpg in conference play last year. In other words, Thompson is simply going to have to be better than the competition. That’s been something of a mixed bag, even with ranked freshmen.


If he does get playing time, how good is Thompson likely to be? Will Hollis be able to match or improve upon the player whose minutes and possessions he will be asked to take?

Below is a table comparing DaJuan Summers’ junior year, and three possible bases for projection:
  • DaJuan Summers’ freshman year (the most obvious single player comparison for Thompson)
  • the weighted average of all Hoya freshman years under JTIII
  • the weighted average years of those freshmen who were ranked in the RSCI.

Player
Year mpg %Poss %Shot ORat FG% TS% 3FG% OReb% DReb% ARate TORate

DaJuan Summers, 08-09 29 25 25 104 47 60 39 5 12 10 22
Jessie Sapp, 08-09 25 16 18 101 37 51 38 6 11 13 22
N. Mescheriakov, 08-09 14 15 16 83 34 45 26 5 8 8 28

DaJuan Summers, 06-07 26 22 22 102 41 54 33 9 9 8 24

All Recruited Hoya
Freshmen 24 19 18 103 47 56 30 7 12 13 24
RSCI Ranked Frosh 24 20 19 108 51 59 31 8 12 12 23
*Stats weighted by minutes per game in order to get an approximation of what Hollis Thomspon might produce if he is good enough to get substantial minutes.

While Hollis is a small forward and thus, from a positional perspective, will be the receipient of Sapp's and potentially Mescheriakov's minutes, his offensive role will be much more like Summers'. In addition, neither of Summers' positional replacements had a possession % north of 15% last year, meaning that from an offensive standpoint, they simply will not use anything close to Summers' number of possessions.

What this means is that I'm mostly comparing Hollis' potential contribution to Summers.

The Encouraging
  • The average Hoya Freshman’s offensive rating is not all that different than Summers’ as a junior, and Summers was the most effective offensive player of the three listed above. RSCI-ranked freshmen were substantially better on a per-possession basis.

  • Freshmen generally don’t take as significant a role in the offense as Summers did. Normally this is not necessarily a good thing; this year it is. Those 3% - 7% of shots and possessions that Hollis is unlikely to take will hopefully go to Monroe, Wright or Freeman.

  • While estimating rebounding by averaging a slew of different positions may be a bit suspect here (are the freshman years of Greg Monroe or Jon Wallace really useful for projecting Hollis Thompson?), I’m inclined to let the projection stand as Hollis is playing the “middle” position at a “middle height” with a half year of college practice under his belt. The “good” here isn’t those projected rebounding numbers. It’s that replacing the two departed upperclassmen or Mescheriakov on the boards won’t be difficult to do.

The Discouraging
  • Summers’ major contribution to the offense last year was his three-point shooting. With both he and Sapp departing, the Hoyas lose their top two three point shooters on the year. History shows: freshmen can’t shoot threes.

  • There’s not a lot of hope on the turnover front. Freshmen can’t hold onto the ball.


The Thing Not Mentioned In That Chart

  • I only have net points for last year in order to statistically evaluate defense, and the freshmen are a mixed bag. But from my eyes and general common knowledge, freshmen just aren’t very good. Just like rebounding, we have a bit of good news: according to net points, the defense was worse when Summers was on the floor. Of course, it also ranked Sapp strongly above average. I’m not sure if this says much about whether Hollis Thompson will make the defense better or worse than last year.

The Big East
  • One might expect freshman to decline in effectiveness once the Big East season gets going. But they don’t seem to do so, at least not anymore than other players. Freshmen see their ORating decline from a 103 to 101 with their poss % stable. RSCI freshman see their poss % drop 1% and their ORating drop a point. It could be that the rapid improvement disguises the increase in competition. Regardless, Hoya freshmen do not see a significant decline in effectiveness in Big East play.


What’s the sum total? Hollis Thompson is not likely to fix the Hoyas’ three point, rebounding or turnover issues. Yes, some freshmen have performed at a very high level. But it simply more likely that Thompson will perform similarly to Summers, while taking less possessions. Like in the Greg Monroe preview, look for your year over year improvement elsewhere.

What Hollis will hopefully do is put in 15-25 good minutes, play efficiently by hitting shots inside the arc, and generally replicate Summers’ efficiency, if not his usage or minutes. This is no small feat for a freshman. And, if the Hoyas take that, and then distribute the remainder of the possessions between the Big Three, the offense should improve.

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Analysis: GU 57, Ball State 48

Well, at least that's over with.

Georgetown went into a no-win situation in Muncie tonight, and Hoya fans were wondering if they'd really have no win at the end of the night before the team made enough FTs in the last minute to secure the game.

Here are the numbers (if you only look at the 1st half, they're actually quite nice):


Offense
Defense

1st Half 2nd Half Total
1st Half 2nd Half Total
Pace 26 30 56











Eff. 120.7 86.7 102.4
70.1 100.0 86.2








eFG% 70.5% 39.1% 54.4%
33.3% 48.1% 40.6%
TO% 23.4% 20.0% 21.6%
15.6% 13.3% 14.4%
OR% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0%
33.3% 18.8% 27.0%
FTA



11.1% 23.1% 17.0%
FTM 0.0% 34.8% 17.8%











Assist Rate 84.6% 50.0% 71.4%
25.0% 60.0% 44.4%
Block Rate 0.0% 8.3% 5.0%
12.5% 35.7% 23.3%
Steal Rate 0.0% 6.7% 3.6%
11.7% 10.0% 10.8%


Slowest pace so far this year (56 possessions, after 62 and 64 to start the year). Once you've stopped hyperventilating about the final score, go back and take a look at the William & Mary breakdown, and you'll see a very similar set of numbers, except this time it was bad rebounding in the 1st half and hot opponent shooting in the 2nd half. As someone mentioned during HoyaChat, this game was also bit like the James Madison game played two years ago to the day.

  Georgetown vs Ball State  
11/21/07 7:05 p.m. at Muncie, Ind. (Worthen Arena)
Final score: Georgetown 57, Ball State 48

Georgetown Min +/- Pts 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A FGA A Stl TO Blk OR DR PF
Summers, DaJuan 29:54 + 11 11/48 3 -6 0 -2 5 -6 8 /33 3 /14 2 /45 3 /43 0 /25 1 /21 8 /28 1
Ewing, Patrick 24:42 + 1 6 /29 3 -3 0 -1 0 -0 4 /30 0 /9 0 /33 1 /33 1 /16 4 /21 1 /21 1
Hibbert, Roy 28:39 + 2 16/39 7 -10 0 -0 2 -7 10/33 1 /8 0 /42 0 /41 4 /22 2 /22 5 /27 2
Wallace, Jonathan 24:17 + 8 3 /40 0 -0 1 -6 0 -0 6 /30 2 /13 0 /38 1 /38 0 /20 0 /22 0 /25 1
Sapp, Jessie 29:25 + 0 11/40 1 -1 3 -9 0 -0 10/32 4 /10 2 /40 3 /40 2 /20 0 /21 2 /23 1
Macklin, Vernon 11:07 + 4 0 /15 0 -0 0 -0 0 -2 0 /12 1 /6 0 /12 0 /13 0 /8 0 /7 1 /9 1
Wright, Chris 16:33 - 1 0 /18 0 -0 0 -2 0 -0 2 /17 3 /7 1 /20 1 /20 0 /12 1 /11 3 /15 0
Rivers, Jeremiah 16:26 + 11 4 /26 0 -0 1 -1 1 -2 1 /19 0 /8 0 /21 0 /22 0 /13 0 /13 3 /17 1
Freeman, Austin 15:13 + 8 6 /26 0 -0 2 -3 0 -0 3 /15 1 /7 0 /20 2 /21 0 /14 0 /10 2 /18 1
Crawford, Tyler 03:44 + 1 0 /4 0 -0 0 -1 0 -0 1 /4 0 /2 1 /4 1 /4 0 /0 0 /2 1 /2 1
TOTALS 40:00 57 14-20 7 -25 8 -17 45 15/21 6 /55 12/55 7 /30 9 /30 27/37 10
0.700 0.280 0.471 0.714 0.109 0.218 0.233 0.300 0.730

Ball State Min +/- Pts 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A FGA A Stl TO Blk OR DR PF
PERRY, Malik 30:16 + 1 8 /43 3 -5 0 -0 2 -2 5 /37 1 /13 1 /42 3 /40 0 /15 4 /23 4 /23 3
GILES, Rob 26:56 - 13 0 /29 0 -2 0 -3 0 -0 5 /37 0 /12 1 /38 1 /38 1 /14 2 /25 3 /17 3
GOINS, Melvin 36:36 - 5 11/43 3 -10 1 -4 2 -2 14/49 2 /12 0 /51 1 /51 0 /17 3 /34 4 /29 0
FRAZIER, Laron 28:06 - 7 6 /33 0 -2 2 -5 0 -0 7 /34 3 /10 0 /41 1 /38 0 /16 0 /23 2 /25 1
STOVALL, Peyton 37:14 - 9 16/46 5 -7 2 -5 0 -3 12/51 2 /10 0 /52 0 /53 0 /19 1 /36 3 /28 4
LAMPLEY, Brandon 11:27 - 12 0 /13 0 -0 0 -1 0 -0 1 /15 0 /5 0 /14 2 /15 0 /6 0 /11 0 /6 1
TWYMAN, Deontay 13:33 + 4 7 /20 0 -1 2 -4 1 -2 5 /19 0 /4 0 /18 0 /20 0 /5 0 /14 2 /14 3
MCLEMORE, Rashaun 15:52 - 4 0 /13 0 -3 0 -1 0 -0 4 /23 0 /6 0 /19 0 /20 0 /8 0 /19 1 /8 0
TOTALS 40:00 48 11-30 7 -23 5 -9 53 8 /18 2 /55 8 /55 1 /20 10/37 21/30 15
0.367 0.304 0.556 0.444 0.036 0.145 0.050 0.270 0.700

Efficiency: Georgetown 1.036, Ball State 0.873
eFG%: Georgetown 0.544, Ball State 0.406
Substitutions: Georgetown 28, Ball State 28

2-pt Shot Selection:
Dunks: Georgetown 6-6, Ball State 0-0
Layups/Tips: Georgetown 6-10, Ball State 8-10
Jumpers: Georgetown 2-4, Ball State 3-20


Edited to add: In case anyone's interested, here are the updated Offensive Efficiencies (speaking of regression to the mean).


Player Name O Rat

Sapp, Jessie 118.6

Summers, DaJuan 96.6

Wallace, Jonathan 129.3

Hibbert, Roy 119.1

Ewing, Patrick 107.5

Macklin, Vernon 118.1

Rivers, Jeremiah 113.1

Freeman, Austin 90.1

Wright, Chris 67.6




On a more positive note, the gentleman on the left has announced his intention to attend Georgetown in 2009. Hollis Thompson is purported to be both an excellent basketball player and excellent student at Loyola of Los Angeles (yeah, he goes to a Jesuit high school), and his verbal commitment has Hoya fans atwitter.