Saturday, December 15, 2007

Analysis: Georgetown 110, Radford 51

No, that's not a typo, Georgetown really did score 110 points in regulation, and win by 59 points.

The numbers are a bit obscene, so without further ado, here's the tempo-free box score:


Offense
Defense

1st Half 2nd Half Total
1st Half 2nd Half Total
Pace 36 36 72











Eff. 144.7 161.7 153.2
77.9 64.1 71.0








eFG% 68.8% 80.4% 74.2%
45.0% 30.8% 37.0%
TO% 13.9% 8.4% 11.1%
25.0% 27.9% 26.5%
OR% 35.7% 33.3% 34.6%
6.7% 27.3% 18.9%
FTA/FGA



70.0% 42.3% 54.3%
FTM/FGA 25.0% 46.4% 35.0%











Assist Rate 42.1% 60.0% 51.3%
57.1% 50.0% 53.3%
Block Rate 5.3% 0.0% 2.6%
11.1% 0.0% 4.3%
Steal Rate 2.8% 0.0% 1.4%
22.3% 19.5% 20.9%


  Radford vs Georgetown  
12/15/07 7:30 pm at McDonough Arena
Final score: Georgetown 110, Radford 51

Radford Min +/- Pts 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A FGA A Stl TO Blk OR DR PF
MCDUFFY, Martell 29:13 - 46 9 /37 3 -4 0 -7 3 -5 11/37 1 /9 1 /51 4 /52 0 /29 3 /30 4 /20 2
JOHNSON, Amir 32:10 - 46 12/43 2 -3 2 -5 2 -4 8 /37 4 /8 0 /57 1 /57 0 /33 0 /30 3 /20 2
THOMAS, Kenny 34:58 - 50 10/44 0 -4 1 -6 7 -8 10/41 1 /12 0 /65 6 /67 0 /32 1 /32 2 /22 0
HALL,Eric 14:06 - 20 2 /19 1 -2 0 -0 0 -0 2 /18 0 /5 0 /25 1 /25 1 /16 0 /13 2 /10 2
LYNCH-FLOR,Joey 10:47 - 24 1 /16 0 -2 0 -0 1 -2 2 /11 0 /4 0 /22 0 /23 0 /9 0 /11 1 /6 5
MCEACHIN,Chris 07:36 + 0 0 /12 0 -1 0 -1 0 -0 2 /8 0 /3 0 /12 1 /13 0 /4 0 /6 0 /5 1
GYNES, Alex 06:31 - 25 2 /5 0 -0 0 -0 2 -4 0 /3 0 /0 0 /15 3 /15 0 /7 0 /6 0 /3 1
WILDER, Cole 06:12 - 18 0 /8 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 0 /6 0 /2 0 /13 3 /13 0 /5 0 /6 0 /4 3
MCFARLIN, Nick 05:36 - 8 2 /8 1 -1 0 -0 0 -0 1 /7 0 /2 0 /9 1 /9 0 /6 0 /4 0 /5 4
KLECKNER, Tyler 04:41 - 1 4 /6 2 -2 0 -0 0 -0 2 /7 0 /1 0 /7 0 /8 0 /3 1 /5 0 /4 1
JENKINS, Jamar 22:05 - 34 7 /28 2 -3 1 -4 0 -0 7 /25 2 /7 0 /37 1 /36 0 /23 1 /17 0 /14 3
MARTIN, Philip 03:07 + 3 0 /4 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 0 /3 0 /0 0 /7 1 /7 0 /0 0 /3 0 /2 1
RICKS, Duane 17:24 - 23 2 /19 0 -1 0 -0 2 -2 1 /21 0 /5 0 /31 0 /31 0 /18 1 /18 1 /9 2
TRENT, Colby 05:34 - 3 0 /6 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 0 /6 0 /2 0 /9 0 /9 0 /5 0 /4 2 /6 2
TOTALS 40:00 51 11-23 4 -23 17-25 46 8 /15 1 /72 22/73 1 /38 7 /37 17/26 29
0.478 0.174 0.680 0.533 0.014 0.301 0.026 0.189 0.654

Georgetown Min +/- Pts 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A FGA A Stl TO Blk OR DR PF
Wallace, Jonathan 16:17 + 43 11/62 1 -1 3 -3 0 -0 4 /29 3 /18 2 /34 2 /34 0 /8 0 /8 0 /16 1
Summers, DaJuan 19:55 + 48 17/71 4 -5 2 -5 3 -3 10/35 3 /20 3 /40 0 /39 1 /11 0 /11 6 /21 3
Sapp, Jessie 16:17 + 43 13/62 2 -5 3 -3 0 -0 8 /29 4 /17 0 /34 0 /34 0 /8 2 /8 2 /16 1
Ewing, Patrick 16:26 + 21 15/44 5 -5 0 -1 5 -6 6 /26 0 /12 0 /30 2 /30 0 /7 3 /11 0 /13 4
Hibbert, Roy 17:21 + 43 8 /62 3 -3 0 -0 2 -5 3 /31 3 /20 1 /35 0 /35 0 /8 1 /10 6 /19 1
Macklin, Vernon 22:39 + 16 5 /48 2 -2 0 -0 1 -3 2 /29 1 /14 0 /38 1 /37 0 /15 0 /16 4 /18 2
Wright, Chris 23:43 + 16 9 /48 3 -5 0 -1 3 -7 6 /31 3 /14 2 /39 2 /38 0 /15 0 /18 3 /21 0
Rivers, Jeremiah 23:43 + 16 4 /48 1 -3 0 -1 2 -2 4 /31 3 /16 3 /39 0 /38 0 /15 0 /18 5 /21 3
Jansen, Bryon 03:29 + 0 0 /4 0 -0 0 -0 0 -0 0 /4 0 /2 0 /6 0 /5 0 /4 0 /4 0 /4 0
Freeman, Austin 20:44 + 36 21/61 5 -6 2 -3 5 -5 9 /31 0 /14 1 /35 2 /36 0 /13 1 /11 1 /19 3
Crawford, Tyler 12:09 - 3 4 /19 2 -3 0 -3 0 -0 6 /15 0 /4 1 /19 1 /19 0 /6 1 /10 1 /9 5
Wattad, Omar 07:17 + 16 3 /21 0 -0 1 -2 0 -0 2 /9 0 /5 2 /16 0 /15 0 /5 0 /5 1 /8 0
TOTALS 40:00 110 28-38 11-22 21-31 60 20/39 15/73 10/72 1 /23 9 /26 30/37 23
0.737 0.500 0.677 0.513 0.205 0.139 0.043 0.346 0.811

Efficiency: Georgetown 1.528, Radford 0.699
eFG%: Georgetown 0.742, Radford 0.370
Substitutions: Georgetown 34, Radford 32

2-pt Shot Selection:
Dunks: Georgetown 6-6, Radford 0-0
Layups/Tips: Georgetown 17-20, Radford 3-6
Jumpers: Georgetown 5-12, Radford 8-17


Some quick observations:
  • I had to go back and check some of these numbers before posting, just to make sure I didn't copy the box score incorrectly, or that I'd screwed up a calculation along the way.
  • While 110 points is remarkable, a lot of college teams are able to put up 100+ points by pushing the tempo. For instance, Syracuse also had a laugher tonight, beating E. Tenn St. 125-75. The Orangemen used ~92 possessions to get those 125 points, for an Offensive Efficiency = 136, certainly impressive. However, the Hoyas managed to score 110 points on only 72 possessions (OEff = 153) and 58 points on 36 possessions in the 2nd half (OEff = 162), which is a much harder thing to do.
  • This game represents the best offensive (OEff = 153) and defensive (DEff = 71) effort that Georgetown has had so far this season.
  • Shooting >80% eFG (in the 2nd half) is fairly obscene (a quick reminder that eFG% is just [2FGM+3FGM*1.5]/FGA, to credit the extra value of a 3-pt shot). However, G'town actually shot a slightly higher percentage in the 2nd half against Jacksonville.
  • The 8.4% TO rate in the 2nd half was the first time this season that Georgetown turned the ball over less than 10% of its possessions for a half.
  • The impressive steal rate (20.9%) should be tempered by realizing that Radford had a 13.5% steal rate allowed this season, 321st out of 341 Div I teams, coming into the game. Like eFG%, the Hoyas had a similar performance against Jacksonville last Sunday. However, unlike last weekend's ragged affair (GU had 14 steals, Jacksonville 13), this time Georgetown only surrendered 1 steal and 8 total turnovers.

2 comments:

  1. HoyaChris here - It will be interesting to see how far this will move us up in Pomeroy where we are currently 24th. We are already at 8 in Sagarin and it would appear that this blowout will push us up to 5 or 6.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Seventh, it turns out. As you posted on Hoyatalk, it's all about sample size these days.

    The rankings probably won't stabilize until mid-February, so there's still plenty of time for Georgetown to move up or down some more.

    ReplyDelete