In a defense-optional affair, the Hoyas beat the Duke Blue Devils this afternoon at the Verizon Center in a game that wasn't nearly as close as the final score indicates.
And you know your blog has made the big time when the only comments you get are simply links to other blogs (that I've never heard of) from an anonymous fellow and a very recently deceased reclusive author.
Let's run the numbers:
TEMPO-FREE BOX SCORE . Home Visitor . Georgetown Duke . 1st Half 2nd Half Total 1st Half 2nd Half Total Pace 33 38 71 Effic. 139.8 114.0 125.8 100.3 116.7 108.9 eFG% 88.6 68.8 78.3 40.7 47.1 44.4 TO% 27.4 18.6 22.6 27.4 15.9 21.2 OR% 20.0 8.3 11.8 50.0 42.9 45.9 FT Rate 31.8 66.7 50.0 48.1 37.1 41.9 Assist Rate 70.6 50.0 60.6 44.4 50.0 47.8 Block Rate 29.4 25.0 27.3 20.0 0.0 9.1 Steal Rate 15.2 10.6 12.7 15.2 15.9 15.6 2FG% 80.0 83.3 81.8 29.4 56.2 42.4 3FG% 71.4 16.7 46.2 40.0 26.3 31.0 FT% 100.0 62.5 73.9 84.6 84.6 84.6
The most important line on the tempo-free box score is third from the bottom - when a team shoots better than 80% from 2FG (and take more than twice as many 2FG as 3FG in the game), the game is effectively over.
This was not a case of a team getting white-hot on their jump shots, as they shot 27 of their 33 attempts inside the arc as either dunks, layups or tip-ins (and made 23 of those). Of course, Chris Wright's consecutive made leaning 2FG jumpers in the 1st half were probably a sign that the Hoyas weren't going to miss too many of any type.
This was the third time this season that Georgetown has passed the 70% eFG threshold for a game this season, and in fact the third straight home game where they've done it (also vs. Seton Hall and Rutgers). Obviously, today's opponent had a slightly better ranked defense (13th) than the other two (120th and 150th, respectively) coming into the game.
A couple of the other green-highlighted numbers to note: the Hoyas consistently contested shots today, which helped to hold down Duke's inside shooting percentage; the Blue Devils averaged less than 17% TO Rate coming into the game, so that 1st half turnover rate must have been a real shock to them.
And since I can't pass on an opportunity to spread some clouds amongst all this sunshine, Georgetown was absolutely obliterated on the glass today. They didn't miss many shots today so it didn't matter, but that's the second consecutive game where the Hoyas gathered less than 20% of their own missed shots.
INDIVIDUAL NET POINTS STATS Georgetown Off % Pts Def Pts Player Poss Poss O.Rtg Prod Poss D.Rtg Allow Net Pts Wright, Chris 67 15.9 151.1 16.1 69 100.8 13.9 +3.8 Monroe, Greg 68 24.7 137.4 23.1 71 102.3 14.5 +7.2 Freeman, Austin 68 22.1 132.5 19.9 69 105.1 14.5 +4.8 Clark, Jason 50 11.3 142.3 8.1 52 120.2 12.5 -1.6 Vaughn, Julian 36 21.6 98.9 7.7 36 99.0 7.1 +0.3 Thompson, Hollis 25 14.0 128.6 4.5 25 83.3 4.2 +1.0 Sanford, Vee 0 - - 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 +0.0 Benimon, Jerrelle 36 22.8 81.9 6.7 37 105.9 7.8 -1.5 TOTALS 70 127.3 86.0 72 103.6 74.6 +14.3 Duke Off % Pts Def Pts Player Poss Poss O.Rtg Prod Poss D.Rtg Allow Net Pts Nolan Smith 64 22.1 124.2 17.6 63 130.4 16.4 +0.1 Kyle Singler 66 23.8 106.5 16.7 65 127.2 16.5 -1.5 Miles Plumlee 39 17.0 80.6 5.3 40 123.1 9.8 -3.7 Jon Scheyer 70 19.8 117.3 16.2 68 115.3 15.7 +0.4 Lance Thomas 56 14.8 107.9 9.0 53 127.1 13.5 -3.0 Mason Plumlee 21 13.1 127.4 3.5 20 80.0 3.2 +0.8 Andre Dawkins 22 19.8 75.8 3.3 21 154.1 6.5 -3.3 Ryan Kelly 17 11.8 0.0 0.0 16 129.3 4.1 -3.4 Brian Zoubek 5 20.0 0.0 0.0 4 225.0 1.8 -2.0 TOTALS 72 104.2 71.6 70 125.1 87.6 -15.3
Today we saw what it looks like when all three of Georgetown's stars are playing well together.
Chris Wright and Austin Freeman carried the brunt of the load in the Lift-off half, with a combined 8/8 2FG, 3/4 3FG, 3/3 FT shooting performance, along with 4 assists).
Greg Monroe was the star of the Vesper half, with 13 points on 4/5 2FG, 5/8 FT shooting and 3 assists, and he got a lot of help from Julian Vaughn, who shot 4/4 2FG in the second half.
Jason Clark had an efficient, low-usage offensive game while stuck with the unenviable task of chasing around Duke's best offensive player (Scheyer). He did a fine job of limiting Scheyer;s best weapon - Duke's most productive FT shooter only had 4 attempts in the game.
If Hollis Thompson can play most games at today's level, Georgetown will become an awfully tough out.
HD BOX SCORE
Duke vs Georgetown
01/30/10 1:00 at Verizon Center
Final score: Georgetown 89, Duke 77
Duke Min +/- Pts 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A FGA A Stl TO Blk OR DR PF
Nolan Smith 35:34 -17 19/64 4- 9 2- 7 5- 8 16/55 1/14 1/63 1/64 0/31 4/36 0/15 2
Kyle Singler 37:50 -17 18/68 1- 5 3- 9 7- 7 14/56 4/15 2/65 2/66 0/31 2/38 4/15 5
Miles Plumlee 21:30 - 8 6/43 2- 5 0- 0 2- 2 5/33 0/ 9 1/40 2/39 2/17 1/23 1/ 6 4
Jon Scheyer 38:19 -11 17/74 2- 5 3- 8 4- 4 13/61 5/17 5/68 3/70 0/31 2/40 2/17 3
Lance Thomas 32:09 - 1 8/62 3- 6 0- 0 2- 3 6/49 1/17 0/53 2/56 0/27 3/30 2/14 4
Mason Plumlee 12:25 +11 4/31 2- 3 0- 0 0- 0 3/20 0/10 2/20 1/21 1/ 9 0/ 8 3/ 8 4
Andre Dawkins 13:16 - 6 5/26 0- 0 1- 4 2- 2 4/21 0/ 5 0/21 1/22 0/11 0/15 1/ 7 2
Ryan Kelly 07:08 - 4 0/15 0- 0 0- 1 0- 0 1/14 0/ 5 0/16 1/17 0/ 5 0/ 9 1/ 3 3
Brian Zoubek 01:49 - 7 0/ 2 0- 0 0- 0 0- 0 0/ 1 0/ 0 0/ 4 1/ 5 0/ 3 0/ 1 0/ 0 2
TOTALS 40:00 77 14-33 9-29 22-26 62 11/23 11/70 15/72 3/33 17/37 15/17 29
. 0.424 0.310 0.846 0.478 0.157 0.208 0.091 0.459 0.882
Georgetown Min +/- Pts 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A FGA A Stl TO Blk OR DR PF
Wright, Chris 38:57 + 8 21/83 7- 7 1- 2 4- 5 9/43 2/22 3/69 3/67 2/33 0/17 4/40 3
Monroe, Greg 39:45 +12 21/89 7- 9 0- 2 7-10 11/46 5/26 2/71 1/68 1/33 0/17 5/40 3
Freeman, Austin 38:28 +12 20/85 6- 8 2- 3 2- 2 11/45 5/24 1/69 3/68 1/33 0/17 3/39 3
Clark, Jason 27:19 +10 9/68 3- 3 1- 2 0- 0 5/35 3/22 0/52 1/50 0/25 0/13 0/29 4
Vaughn, Julian 19:25 +10 8/45 4- 4 0- 0 0- 2 4/23 2/14 0/36 3/36 3/21 1/ 8 2/23 3
Thompson, Hollis 14:39 + 6 6/31 0- 0 2- 3 0- 0 3/15 0/ 9 2/25 1/25 1/ 8 0/ 4 2/11 3
Sanford, Vee 00:37 + 0 0/ 0 0- 0 0- 0 0- 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 1 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 1 0
Benimon, Jerrelle 20:50 + 2 4/44 0- 2 0- 1 4- 4 3/23 3/15 1/37 3/36 1/12 0/ 9 2/17 4
TOTALS 40:00 89 27-33 6-13 17-23 46 20/33 9/72 16/70 9/33 2/17 20/37 23
. 0.818 0.462 0.739 0.606 0.125 0.229 0.273 0.118 0.541
Efficiency: Georgetown 1.271, Duke 1.069
eFG%: Georgetown 0.783, Duke 0.444
Substitutions: Georgetown 17, Duke 24
2-pt Shot Selection:
Dunks: Georgetown 5-5, Duke 2-2
Layups/Tips: Georgetown 18-22, Duke 10-18
Jumpers: Georgetown 4-6, Duke 2-13
Fast break pts (% FG pts): Georgetown 20 (27.8), Duke 6 (10.9)
Pts (eff.) after steal: Georgetown 16 (177.8), Duke 15 (136.4)
Seconds per poss: Georgetown 18.2, Duke 15.9
--------
Stats pages will be updated tomorrow.
it's the second college game that Obama's attended this season _ college game_
ReplyDeleteArticle about today's game: http://college-basketball.suite101.com/article.cfm/georgetown-hoyas-roll-past-duke-blue-devils
ReplyDeleteAs long as Salinger is here, the other recently deceased might add:
ReplyDeleteAmong such blogs, an excellent one, this is. —Louis Auchincloss
A mystery why more don't post here. —Ralph McInerny
I'd use any of this for my cartoons in the New York Review of Books. —David Levine
I share your philosophy about the Hoyas. —Stephen Toulmin
"Hoya Prospectus
ReplyDeleteThinking rationally about Georgetown Hoyas' basketball so you don't have to."
Man, I love this site! Quantifying the team presents such a clear picture. Thanx for the tremendous effort.
Thank you for quantifying and clarifying what I thought I saw. If Duke ran good offense and we challenged their shot, logic suggests that we would sacrifice something on rebounding position if Duke crashes. Conversely, by crashing Duke opens up more fast break and easy basket opportunities for us. While my eyes were ocassionally frustrated by our rebounding, I am not yet persuaded that a major problem exists. It bears watching.
ReplyDelete